From: ThoML <micathom@...>
Date: 2008-05-09T12:25:03+09:00
Subject: Re: Reverse Divisible Numbers (#161)


> examine the visual patterns of the
> numbers, noting that there were arrangements of 8712 and 9801 (and
> their
> reverses) that repeated themselves in larger numbers. Their solutions
> reflect this approach, yet they admit to being incomplete solutions:
> they
> don't find every reverse divisible number.

They may be incomplete (although I'm not so sure this is true for
marcelo's approach) but at least they find some numbers in finite
time.