From: "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>
Date: 2002-01-03T02:51:13+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:30062] Re: Ruby parsers in Ruby

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Dave Thomas <Dave@PragmaticProgrammer.com>
To: ruby-talk ML <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:18 AM
Subject: [ruby-talk:30044] Re: Ruby parsers in Ruby


> "MikkelFJ" <mikkelj-anti-spam@post1.dknet.dk> writes:
> 
> > And an up to date specification of the standard libraries. The spec
> > need not be as well-written as say the pick-axe book, but it should
> > unambigiously define behanviour of the classes.  This is
> > particularly important because ever so often a new function is
> > introduced which is not covered by the printed publications.
> 
> Imagine... that the C source of the built-in libraries in Rite
> included RDoc documentation of each class, module, and method
> (bootstrapped from the current ri descriptions, perhaps)...
> 
> You may say I'm a dreamer....

But you're not the only one... 

Hal