From: Pierre-Charles David <Pierre-Charles.David@...>
Date: 2002-01-03T01:16:35+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:30052] Re: Ruby parsers in Ruby

Dave Thomas <Dave@pragmaticprogrammer.com> writes:

> "MikkelFJ" <mikkelj-anti-spam@post1.dknet.dk> writes:
> 
> > And an up to date specification of the standard libraries. The spec
> > need not be as well-written as say the pick-axe book, but it should
> > unambigiously define behanviour of the classes.  This is
> > particularly important because ever so often a new function is
> > introduced which is not covered by the printed publications.
> 
> Imagine... that the C source of the built-in libraries in Rite
> included RDoc documentation of each class, module, and method
> (bootstrapped from the current ri descriptions, perhaps)...

Do you mean something like Emacs Lisp documentation strings?

-- 
Pierre-Charles David (pcdavid <at> emn <dot> fr)
Computer Science PhD Student, �cole des Mines de Nantes, France
Homepage: http://purl.org/net/home/pcdavid