From: Florian Gilcher <flo@...>
Date: 2008-04-19T19:06:41+09:00
Subject: Re: why doesn't ruby have generics?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Apr 19, 2008, at 11:58 AM, thufir wrote:

> Is it because Ruby is dynamic, or something else?
>
>
> -Thufir
>
>

Why would you bind to a type in a language that doesn't really
care about types? Otherwise, it is easy to implement such
functionality - just build a new kind of array that has to be
constructed with a class. Check for this class on insertion.
I don't see the use, though.

Regards,
Florian Gilcher
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkgJxCEACgkQJA/zY0IIRZYhXQCcDqUzhMN7cWJoYivpAXjx8s22
ZnwAn2VxHriGauNMTNod/uNtZNh76a9+
=JY6m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----