From: Heesob Park <phasis@...>
Date: 2008-04-16T14:11:27+09:00
Subject: Re: umask vs umask

Hi,

Daniel Berger wrote:
> On Apr 15, 9:29 pm, Heesob Park <pha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> And make "ruby.exe.manifest" in the the folder where ruby.exe runs with the following content:
>> > didn't work either.
>>
>> > I'm not really sure where to go from here.
>>
>> The version # '8.0.50608.0' in the ruby.exe.manifest must be same to the
>> verision # in your Microsoft.VC80.CRT.manifest file.
> 
> I checked that, as well as the public key token. Heres my
> Microsoft.VC80.CRT.manifest, just in case:
> 
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
> <!-- Copyright � 1981-2001 Microsoft Corporation -->
> <assembly xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1"
> manifestVersion="1.0">
>     <noInheritable/>
>     <assemblyIdentity
>         type="win32"
>         name="Microsoft.VC80.CRT"
>         version="8.0.50608.0"
>         processorArchitecture="x86"
>         publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b"
>     />
>     <file name="msvcr80.dll"/>
>     <file name="msvcp80.dll"/>
>     <file name="msvcm80.dll"/>
> </assembly>
> 
> I'm not sure what the problem is. But, a more pressing issue is how
> the build scripts should be altered so that either this happens
> automatically, or so that it's not necessary (if possible).
> 
As I tested with msvcr90.dll on VC++ 9.0 compiled ruby,
I cannot confirm your problem.

Try google for msvcr80.dll problem .

Here is some links:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cpp/vcredists_x86.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/nikolad/archive/2005/09/02/460368.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/vcblog/archive/2007/10/12/how-to-redistribute-the-visual-c-libraries-with-your-application.aspx


Regards,

Park Heesob
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.