From: "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>
Date: 2001-12-31T13:30:20+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:29803] Re: Proc.class vs yield

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Michael Lucas-Smith <s3225202@student.anu.edu.au>
To: ruby-talk ML <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 9:46 PM
Subject: [ruby-talk:29797] Re: Proc.class vs yield


> >So typically you'd see:
> >
> >  def my_method(arg1, arg2, &block)
> >    ...
> >  end
> >
> >I'm not sure what you want to do in your example....  What are you
> >expecting &a and &b to be?
> >
> Two proc's. It seems that I can't pass two procs to a method unless the 
> calling method is horribly ugly.

You can pass a proc just like any other object
(without the ampersand)... the & notation grabs
the block that is specified with the method call,
and (as they said in _Highlander_) there can be 
only one.

But as ordinary parameters, you can pass any
number of Proc objects...

Hal Fulton