From: Michael Lucas-Smith <s3225202@...>
Date: 2001-12-31T12:21:18+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:29793] Re: Proc.class vs yield


> I've always assumed that blocks denote a piece of code plus an argument
> list plus a binding, but without wrapping these things up into an
> object. Maybe it's more efficient to do it this way?
> 
> 


I suspect you're right. In Smalltalk, every bit of code inside the [] is 
another object. They're always all full block closures. I have no idea 
what this does to the performance.

Michael.