From: Chris Guo Date: 2008-04-10T14:25:27+09:00 Subject: Re: RubyâEURO(tm)s not ready - an indepth essay On Apr 8, 10:53 am, Song Ma wrote: > [Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.] > > F.Y.I > > Not sure if you guys have read this article, I am going to re-post it here. > > http://glyphobet.net/blog/essay/228 I have read most of the comments in this forum. Most of them are helpful while some key points in the blog were not touched. This is an example: "In another incident in the same article, the original Rails author admits that the original Rails code required about four hundred restarts a day, or six to seven restarts per thread per day. Four hundred restarts a day means four-hundred chances for a database transaction to fail...." The question is: Is the statement true? Why should I concern this? Because my next project will be a webgame(for thoese who don't know webgame, please visit www.travian.com). I'm considering use Ruby on rails to develop this web app. For such application, beging stable is extremedly important or the player will leave with anger when data was lost, data being inconsistency or something like that. If the statement is true, then should I turn from rails to Pylons?