From: Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Date: 2008-04-08T03:19:28+09:00
Subject: Re: Lisper says to rubyist: gimmie your syntax tree


On Apr 7, 2008, at 10:34 , Paul Brannan wrote:

> An intermediate representation that abstracts away some of the  
> details of the AST is I think what's needed.

Yup yup.

I'm going this direction with the UnifiedRuby rewriter in ParseTree  
(which I will probably extract into its own release), but it is  
currently still too low level. I'm working on pulling it up a bit and  
making it the default output from ParseTree and ruby_parser. There  
will still be "raw" versions you can call.