From: Robert Dober <robert.dober@...>
Date: 2008-03-27T23:21:50+09:00
Subject: Re: Why git instead of mercurial?

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

>  * having explicit central repository is a good thing for Ruby
Sorry to be bold for once Matz, but this sentence surprises me a lot,
why is a single point of failure a good thing?
What I like most about Mercurial (and distributed VCS in general) to
have my repository on 4 different PCs and 3 pendrives, while top is
not on all seven it is almost impossible to really lose data.
Never been afraid of this?
Cheers
Robert
>
>                                                         matz.
>
>



-- 
http://ruby-smalltalk.blogspot.com/

---
Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.
Ludwig Wittgenstein