From: James Britt <james.britt@...>
Date: 2008-03-27T05:51:25+09:00
Subject: Re: Why git instead of mercurial?

Luis Lavena wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2:52 pm, James Britt <james.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Luis Lavena wrote:
>>
>>> ... but most
>>> of the Ruby developers that works on projects (Web frameworks or
>>> tools) decided for Git instead of anything else.
>> Data, please.
>>
> 
> Web frameworks:
> Rails - svn
> Merb - git
> Ramaze - darcs
> Sinatra - git
> 

Nitro: darcs

Don't know about the other dozen or so Web frameworks.

(Isn't Rails on git, but synced with svn?)

> The new trend is put your Rails/Merb plugin in GitHub or Gitorious...
> that is real cool...

If you use Rails/Merb.

> 
> Ruby Web servers:
> Ebb - git
> Thin - git
> Mongrel - svn

Rack: darcs, I think.
WEBrick: svn

Projects on rubyforge:  svn (at least in some respect), or cvs.



-- 
James Britt

"A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming is 
not worth knowing."
   - A. Perlis