From: James Britt <james.britt@...>
Date: 2008-03-27T05:46:00+09:00
Subject: Re: Why git instead of mercurial?

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In message "Re: Why git instead of mercurial?"
>     on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:47:06 +0900, James Britt <james.britt@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> |Interesting.  I know a number of Ruby people using darcs or hg, but no 
> |one using git.  I'm wondering if it's a Railsville thing, not a Rubyland 
> |thing
> 
> I personally use git (actually stgit) on my machine, then push/pull
> changes to the central subversion repository.
> 

I'm curious: When there was a move away from CVS, why didn't the ruby 
source tree go to git, instead of svn?



-- 
James Britt

"A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming is 
not worth knowing."
   - A. Perlis