From: Gareth Adams <gareth.adams@...>
Date: 2008-03-27T01:24:29+09:00
Subject: Re: INTERPRETED LANGUAGE

Robert Dober wrote:
> BTW this is run with Ruby1.8 but Ruby1.9 gives the same results, this
> is very troublesome. Like Ken I was certain that bASic was a subset of
> Ruby ;)
> Robert

No, Ruby is basic. BASIC isn't Ruby

Gareth