From: "Bjørn Arild Mæland" Date: 2008-03-26T21:14:54+09:00 Subject: Re: Why git instead of mercurial? On Mar 26, 8:51 am, Izidor Jerebic wrote: > On 25.3.2008, at 9:07, Matt Todd wrote: > > > Plus, with GitHub.com now, it's hard to say no. Where's the hghub.com? > > The correct address is not hghub.com, but sharesource.org :-) > Subversion and mercurial support... > > izidor I jumped on the git bandwagon back in october, but later changed my preference to Mercurial. It's ui just feels cleaner. As someone mentioned in a previos reply, branching in git kinda makes more sense tho. I must admit that GitHub makes me want to change back to git again - it's an excellent site. Sharesource.org is just a shell over hgweb no?