From: MenTaLguY <mental@...>
Date: 2008-03-26T11:07:22+09:00
Subject: Re: Thread#raise, Thread#kill, and timeout.rb are unsafe

--=-gFOLCLEwS62jL4/fPjEA
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 19:33 +0900, Tanaka Akira wrote:
> I'm not sure your assumption.  If an operation will be
> resumed later, why the operation needs timeout?  What a task
> should be done between the timeout and the resuming?  Why
> the task should not be done in another thread?

That's a good point; if another thread is used most of the cases I was
thinking of are unnecessary.  So I think I'm satisfied.

-mental

--=-gFOLCLEwS62jL4/fPjEA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBH6a/rEpMFVe94r24RAq8RAJ9/BgttIc08Ov+nEvvss3ldUIhF+wCfWIqZ
Zb/lSN49OBJtXesHPyYWL1M=
=vhKL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-gFOLCLEwS62jL4/fPjEA--