From: Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Date: 2008-03-26T10:59:52+09:00
Subject: Re: Why git instead of mercurial?

On Mar 25, 2:52 pm, James Britt <james.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Luis Lavena wrote:
>
> > ... but most
> > of the Ruby developers that works on projects (Web frameworks or
> > tools) decided for Git instead of anything else.
>
> Data, please.
>

Web frameworks:
Rails - svn
Merb - git
Ramaze - darcs
Sinatra - git

The new trend is put your Rails/Merb plugin in GitHub or Gitorious...
that is real cool...

Ruby Web servers:
Ebb - git
Thin - git
Mongrel - svn

Web servers:
Apache - svn
Nginx - ?
Cherokee - svn

New Ruby-like Implementations:
Rubinius - git
Sapphire - cvs
IronRuby - TFS to svn

> I keep reading amazing assertion about how "most Rubyists do this" and
> "everyone's doing that", but never anything to suggest these are mere
> guesses based on selective experiences in specific corners of the vast
> Ruby universe.

You're correct, most of use consider Machinists (the guys who run on
Rails) part of the vast Ruby universe, but we should consider them a
different breed of people...

--
Luis Lavena