From: Mark Hahn <mchahn@...>
Date: 2001-12-29T04:22:12+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:29575] Re: New Rubygarden poll

You can only sort by subject.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobu.nokada@softhome.net [mailto:nobu.nokada@softhome.net]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:20 AM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: [ruby-talk:29574] Re: New Rubygarden poll


At Sat, 29 Dec 2001 03:15:00 +0900,
Dave Thomas <Dave@PragmaticProgrammer.com> wrote:
> > At any rate, I would like to see the message number remain easily
> > accessible. If it has to be moved, I would favor the end of the
> > subject line or the first line of the body.
> > 
> > As for a header: Well, you may flame me, hate me, or denigrate me,
> > but my most commonly used email client is Outlook Express.
> 
> From what I understand, as an Outlook user you currently don't get
> proper threading of mailing list messages. With the numbers removed,
> threading should start working. So you have a tradeoff between the
> convenience of threading and the convenience of being able to see a
> message number quickly.

I have a question.  Can Outlook really construct thread trees
correctly if subjects are not numbered?  Or it can just group
the messages by the subjects?


Nobu Nakada