From: James Britt Date: 2008-03-26T02:47:06+09:00 Subject: Re: Why git instead of mercurial? Matt Todd wrote: > I really don't think the internal implementation has that much > influence over the popularity of the chosen SCMs. I think it has more > to do with the fact that Git is the fastest (but not by much) and has > a greater deal of general use compared to Mercurial. Also, Git is > fairly low level, and I think that a good deal of the Ruby developers > out there want to have this amount of control over their repos. Interesting. I know a number of Ruby people using darcs or hg, but no one using git. I'm wondering if it's a Railsville thing, not a Rubyland thing -- James Britt "Tear it up and start again." - Anonymous