From: Robert Dober Date: 2008-03-26T02:12:57+09:00 Subject: Re: Why git instead of mercurial? On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Luis Lavena wrote: > > Honestly I do not see any connection to Ruby in this thread. > > There is a connection anyway. The option for a VCS/DVCS make difficult > for users contribute back with patches to fix issues. Hmm maybe bad style of mine to declare the thread OT. I should rather have expressed the failure to understand OP's concern. A choice has to be made and such choice will always be unfortunate for those familiar with the *other* tools. Or is there something particularly difficult with GIT, than in fact I would understand OP's concern, which I do not, right now. Cheers Robert -- http://ruby-smalltalk.blogspot.com/ --- Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. Ludwig Wittgenstein