From: Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
Date: 2008-03-25T23:41:12+09:00
Subject: Re: Why git instead of mercurial?

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:15:28PM +0900, Robert Dober wrote:
> If the Ruby team has chosen GIT they either had

Ruby itself is developed using svn.

> Honestly I do not see any connection to Ruby in this thread.

A lot of Ruby developers these days are moving to git.  I think it's
perfectly valid to ask why rather than to blindly follow along.

I wonder how long it will be before we see git support on rubyforge.

Paul