From: Robert Dober Date: 2008-03-25T23:15:28+09:00 Subject: Re: Why git instead of mercurial? On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote: Although I am a perfect fan and user of Mercurial I believe that this discussion is at least OT if not futile. If the Ruby team has chosen GIT they either had (a) no knowledge of Mercurial and GIT just satisfied their needs (b) known both and decided to use GIT for some (surely perfectly reasonable, but not really interesting ) reason and why should they care about the implementation language? They might have chosen a different DistVCS if it were written in Ruby maybe ;) Honestly I do not see any connection to Ruby in this thread. Cheers Robert -- http://ruby-smalltalk.blogspot.com/ --- Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. Ludwig Wittgenstein