From: James Tucker <jftucker@...>
Date: 2008-03-25T20:41:07+09:00
Subject: Re: Why git instead of mercurial?


On 25 Mar 2008, at 11:36, Jason Roelofs wrote:
> I find it funny that your only point of comparison between git and
> Mercurial is the technology with which said tool is implemented. Last
> time I checked, the *only* time developers care about how something is
> implemented is if it's Windows only (.NET, MFC). If the tool works,
> people will use it.

Java.

> How about an actual comparison of git and Mercurial functionality  
> wise?
>
> Jason