From: Park Heesob <phasis68@...>
Date: 2008-03-22T20:46:19+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby Compiler

Hi,
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Yukihiro Matsumoto" <matz@ruby-lang.org>
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby Compiler


> Hi,
> 
> In message "Re: Ruby Compiler"
>    on Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:54:40 +0900, "Park Heesob" <phasis68@hotmail.com> writes:
> 
> |> Have you measured the performance of the "compiler"?
> |
> |Actually the performance is not as good as I expected.
> |For the simple source code, the peformance is not better than ruby interpreter.
> |If the parsing time takes longer, the performance is better enough.
> |I guess the web environment ruby code like Ruby On Rails can have some performance gain. 
> 
> Last time I have benchmarked, parsing time was not significant.  I am
> very interested in how much this approach works for what kind of
> situation, say RoR.
> 

I realized the parsing time is not an issue of performance after several tests.
So the performance gain with skipping parsing might be just a vain efforts.
For the real speed up, I believe the optimization of node tree is required.
Thank you for your attention.

Regards,
Park Heesob