From: Park Heesob Date: 2008-03-22T11:54:40+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby Compiler Hi, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Yukihiro Matsumoto" To: "ruby-talk ML" Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 10:42 AM Subject: Re: Ruby Compiler > Hi, > > In message "Re: Ruby Compiler" > on Sat, 22 Mar 2008 09:56:28 +0900, "Park Heesob" writes: > > |> Does the loading for the parsed/node tree generated dump avoid > |> evaluation? I mean, there is no need to reparse it, right? If so, then > |> you have a speed boost when loading pre-compiled ruby scripts and > |> sounds good. > |> > |Yes, of course. The main purpose is speed up. > > Have you measured the performance of the "compiler"? > Actually the performance is not as good as I expected. For the simple source code, the peformance is not better than ruby interpreter. If the parsing time takes longer, the performance is better enough. I guess the web environment ruby code like Ruby On Rails can have some performance gain. > matz. > Regards, Park Heesob