From: Jano Svitok <jan.svitok@...>
Date: 2008-03-19T18:39:23+09:00
Subject: Re: For Comment: Gem Browser

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 8:06 AM, s.ross <cwdinfo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi--
>
>  A few updates to http://gemmy.calicowebdev.com.
>
>  + Added description field if one is present. This is typically either
>  blank or the same as the summary, but where it differs, it is expanded
>  on demand.
>  + Added more weight to gem name in an attempt to tweak full-text
>  matching accuracy.
>  + Removed "it just breaks" dependency on cookies.
>  + Added a bit more commentary to the results count to explain why only
>  25 are shown when 2300 are found.
>  + Added obligatory dumb logo.
>  + Added some "help" text (as if people who need Ruby Gems need help!).
>
>  The goal of this tool is to be pretty quick and pretty functional and
>  pretty bare bones. Just the facts.
>
>  As always, I'm interested in your comments and suggestions --
>  particularly whether search is finding what you expect and whether
>  help is helpful or a waste of time.

You could #uniq the version numbers and list platforms as well.