From: Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Date: 2008-03-17T02:35:22+09:00
Subject: Re: argh! more undocumented mysteries: to_yaml


On Mar 16, 2008, at 12:13 PM, Tom Cloyd wrote:

> OK, but consider my situation: Using the online documentation (links  
> to which I've already given), I see two things - to_yaml IS a part  
> of Object class, AND it appears in association with MANY other  
> classes. This is not only not a simple picture, it is downright  
> misleading.

The current ruby-doc.org core documentation has been built to include  
things that are not core. That's easily fixed by the owners of the  
site, and, no that you've pointed it out, I'd assume that this is  
something that will happen.

So, let's move on.


Dave