From: Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Date: 2008-03-17T01:06:22+09:00
Subject: Re: argh! more undocumented mysteries: to_yaml


On Mar 16, 2008, at 9:18 AM, Tom Cloyd wrote:

> I will hold out for the possibility that with a little more  
> examination you'll see what I have so far missed - the reason for  
> this problem.

Just to follow up on my previous email...

It's also possible you saw Object#to_yaml if you're using the 'ri'  
utility and you have the yaml library installed on your local machine.  
ri lists all the methods that can possibly appear in a class, and  
(somewhat stupidly) fails to differential between those that are built  
in and those that can be added. (I say somewhat stupidly because it  
was my fault :).

Regards


Dave Thomas