From: Sebastian Hungerecker <sepp2k@...>
Date: 2008-03-16T00:33:01+09:00
Subject: Re: [RRR] Robert's Ruby Riddle: Methodical Digits

Robert Dober wrote:
> Take the hint, the solution is a short one, much less than the 132
> characters of the second solution.
>
> But maybe there are even more solutions than these two.

I don't know whether that's the solution you wanted, but it's short anyway:

> The following whitespace is intentional of course
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

ruby rrr02.rb '?*.to_s(base)' '?*.to_s'
Or if the base hadn't been set to two (or there at all):
ruby rrr02.rb '?*.to_s(?c-?a)' '?*.to_s'

-- 
Jabber: sepp2k@jabber.org
ICQ: 205544826