From: Bryan Richardson <btricha@...>
Date: 2008-02-25T11:06:18+09:00
Subject: Re: OptionParser - no short options or incomplete options

------=_Part_6719_6523658.1203905184241
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I'd just hate for someone to fat-finger a simple option and end up deleting
an entire database worth of data.  Am I overlooking something?  Also, what
if I wanted -l to do one thing, and --long_option to do something
different?  I'm not trying to get on anyone's nerves here, I'm just
wondering if forcing long options is doable...

--
Thanks!
Bryan

On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 5:20 PM, 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Bryan Richardson wrote:
> > Thanks for responding 7stud.  However, I'm not clear on how this will
> > solve
> > my problem.  By typing -l, I'll still execute this option.
>
> You've given no reason why forcing your users to type more than they
> have to is required.
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
>

------=_Part_6719_6523658.1203905184241--