From: Alex Shulgin <alex.shulgin@...>
Date: 2008-02-17T17:54:57+09:00
Subject: Re: Decimal 0.0.1 Released (was 0.0)

On Feb 16, 8:54 pm, Tadashi Saito <sh...@mail2.accsnet.ne.jp> wrote:
>
> "There are two choices here. One is 13-years matured and well-used, another is
>  only 5 years old and used optionally.  Which do you want?"
>
> I chose the former.

OK, I see your point.  As have no experience with BigDecimal, I just
wondered why people reinvent things--now I see there are perfectly
valid reasons. :-)

--
Good luck,
Alex