From: tho_mica_l <micathom@...>
Date: 2008-02-08T01:24:56+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby type-safe? Ruby strongly/weakly typed? Ruby pitfalls?

> This reminds me about several good articles related with Dynamic typing
> versus Static typing.

And how little the arguments perpetuated in these articles have
changed
since I first looked into lisp. BTW why don't we all use Lisp or
Smalltalk today?

Ruby is a pretty cool language and the perfect tool for a lot of use
cases. Some optional strictness here and there really wouldn't hurt
though.

Regards,
Thomas.