From: yudi <yudi.xue@...>
Date: 2008-02-06T14:34:34+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] Introducing Waves - Web App Framework

------=_Part_12932_3382044.1202276079758
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

different pattern, using mapping on controller and module interesting.
Now what is the pros and cons?

any other framework adopting this pattern?

good job by the way!

On Feb 5, 2008 7:30 PM, Dean Wampler <deanwampler@gmail.com> wrote:

> Or Merb?
>
> On Feb 5, 2008 7:10 PM, Daniel DeLorme <dan-ml@dan42.com> wrote:
>
> > Dan Yoder wrote:
> > > I am pleased to announce the first beta release of Waves, an
> open-source
> > > framework for building Ruby-based Web applications. Waves is
> > > feature-rich, compact, and extensible. Waves is thread-safe,
> > > hot-patchable, and supports easy clustering. Waves relies on
> > > best-of-breed Ruby libraries, including Rack, Mongrel, Sequel,
> Markaby,
> > > and Erubis, among others. And it uses just-in-time class and module
> > > creation to minimize the code you have to write.
> >
> > It's a very nice effort and all that, but it seems to me that this is
> > just like rails, except done in a slightly different way, different
> > conventions, etc. So let me ask the (possible rude) question that
> > matters most:
> >
> > Why should I use this instead of rails?
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Dean Wampler
> http://www.objectmentor.com
> http://www.aspectprogramming.com
> http://aquarium.rubyforge.org
> http://www.contract4j.org
>



-- 
Do not be afraid of Change.

------=_Part_12932_3382044.1202276079758--