From: Day <iamday@...>
Date: 2008-02-06T10:49:13+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby type-safe? Ruby strongly/weakly typed? Ruby pitfalls?

------=_Part_15407_26735598.1202262550643
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Feb 5, 2008 7:20 PM, rule.rule.rule@gmail.com <rule.rule.rule@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Criticism
> - Lack of variable declarations
> - Dynamic typing
> - Overloaded operators
> - Reflective and meta-programming features

I find this interesting. I would count all four of these as assets. If
nothing else, I think the Wikipedia article should present the GOOD side of,
say, dynamic typing and meta-programming features (Rails uses meta-stuff
heavily, no?). I don't want to get into more wikidebate, so I'll just say
that.


Ben

------=_Part_15407_26735598.1202262550643--