From: "Dr.Ruud" <rvtol+news@...>
Date: 2008-02-01T19:45:03+09:00
Subject: Re: regular expression negate a word (not character)

Greg Bacon schreef:
> Dr.Ruud:

>> I negated the test, to make the regex simpler: [...]
>
> Yes, your approach is simpler. I assumed from the "need it all
> in one pattern" constraint that the OP is feeding the regular
> expression to some other program that is looking for matches.

Yes, I assumed about the same, but thought it would be a nice
alternative anyways.
Happy Perling!

-- 
Affijn, Ruud

"Gewoon is een tijger."