From: James Gray <james@...>
Date: 2008-01-31T22:31:48+09:00
Subject: Re: Final Two Quizzes

On Jan 30, 2008, at 11:03 PM, John Joyce wrote:

>
> On Jan 30, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Robert Dober wrote:
>
>>> I agree that the summary is usually pretty good.  James is very  
>>> insightful.
>> Hey all summaries are not from him LOL, no but that is an important
>> think to know.
>>>
>>> Nothing against rubyquiz2, but maybe the quiz could take on more  
>>> of a
>>> community effort?
>> I have already expressed my interest to be part of such a team but in
>> a private discussion with James. Obviously the time has come to
>> discuss this publicly.  Count me in.
>>> Like a project on rubyforge backed by a group of
>>> people (not me, of course, mostly because I'm an idiot :)
>> If being an idiot is a problem count me out again ;).
>>>
>>> I feel like the quiz handling is too big for one person, unless, of
>>> course, that person realizes that being timely is important, which
>>> James was exceptional at.
>> Amen, maybe we need a "responsible" or "project admin" in good old
>> open source tradition but I feel that only a team can make this going
>> on, there will be no JEG IV (pun intended of course).
>> Cheers
>> Robert
>>>
>>> my little copper pieces,
>> you mean your change from the last Ruby Quiz???
>>>
>>> Todd
>>
>> ---
>> Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.
>> Ludwig Wittgenstein
>>
> all right Robert, you're in as well.
> we definitely are getting enough people that we need to establish  
> some roles and a decision making process that avoids fighting or  
> problems among everyone with a focus on producing and maintaining  
> quizes

I have a #rubyquiz channel on Freenode.  You all are welcome to use it  
to coordinate, if you want.

James Edward Gray II