From: Martin DeMello <martindemello@...>
Date: 2008-01-30T15:09:31+09:00
Subject: Re: neat idea from arc

On Jan 30, 2008 3:52 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
>
> Well ... not sure about this relative to Ruby, but I must admit I'm a
> bit disappointed in Arc itself. Sure, it's a "dialect of Lisp", but does
> it differ *enough* from Scheme or Common Lisp in any *practical* way?
>
> I think I'll stick with Ruby. :)

Same here. I was excited, but it doesn't look all that special. Qi has
a lot more promise that way.

martin