From: James Gray Date: 2008-01-30T08:04:33+09:00 Subject: Re: Final Two Quizzes On Jan 29, 2008, at 4:01 PM, Dominik Honnef wrote: > I really don't want to be pessimistic nor do I want to put somebody > off, > but I have to mention that, whoever wants to take the job, has to be > sure, what he has to do. > It's not only a taking part (but of course it's a great chance to > learn Ruby), > but also a lot of giving, meaning that it can be alot more work than > you may think in the first > moment. Oh yeah, it's a lot of work. I'm sure you can search the archives and find me saying that, a lot. :) Luckily, it is rewarding work. Well, at least for those who value the same things I do. > (Why I'm posting this as a reply to James and not to Thomas is that > James shouldn't be too > much like "It's a great job" without mentioning the possible problems. The time commitment is the biggest problem. I have it down to about four or five hours of my time a week now (depending on how popular the quiz was) and I have a hard time imagining someone doing it in less time. Well, unless you want to ditch the summary. ;) I've considered that. It's hard to know how much the summary adds. I don't know if I write about the right stuff or show the right code. I'm sure I don't do all of that all the time. The discussion for the good problems is usually very good. I bet reading the emails is at least as helpful as reading my summaries. That's how I decide what to write about anyway. :) That might be one option to reduce the time commitment. > However, I hope you don't see this in any offending way. No offense taken. > I'm new to this quiz and I really like it, so I just want the best > for it :)) Me too on all accounts except for being new to the quiz. ;) James Edward Gray II