From: Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@...>
Date: 2001-12-18T01:39:21+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:28792] Re: RDoc - Document Ruby source files

On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 01:31:56AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
> "Christian Boos" <cboos@bct-technology.com> writes:
> 
> >  Why not? :)
> > 
> > Some kind of combination of chroot() to launch an auxilliary
> > interpreter in a sandbox, and drb (distributed Ruby) to connect
> > that application, then it can well self_destruct whatever it wants :)
> 
> Because then it won't run in the environment in which it will finally
> run, and hence I still won't be able to deduce all the stuff I need
> to.
> 
> I can't see any way that a documentation tool can execute a program in
> order to be able to build the runtime class model. I'd love to be
> shown to be wrong, because then I'll incorporate the feature.
Look at http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/raa-list.rhtml?name=Path
RDoc fails to build full documentation for it. It is very similar to what
I have in my case.
-- 
/ Alexander Bokovoy
$ cat /proc/identity >~/.signature
  `Senior software developer and analyst for SaM-Solutions Ltd.`
---
Nov 21 20:58:58 alconost kernel: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. 
		    Self-destruct in 5 seconds.  Have a nice day...