From: Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@...>
Date: 2001-12-18T00:06:58+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:28783] Re: RDoc - Document Ruby source files

On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:41:36PM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
> Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@sam-solutions.net> writes:
> 
> > If I were able to specify which part of code rdoc needs to load and
> > execute in order to get my stubs that would be good compromise because
> > then I'd put aforementioned code inside and be happy with documentation
> > for that classes.
> 
> As an alternative, would it help to have a hint to RDoc in the
> individual loaded modules, so you could specify a superclass even
> though one doesn't appear in the source?
It would help to save class inheritance info. Unfortunately it wouldn't
help to identify an existence of methods that were added during
eval()-uation. 

-- 
/ Alexander Bokovoy
$ cat /proc/identity >~/.signature
  `Senior software developer and analyst for SaM-Solutions Ltd.`
---
Nov 21 20:58:58 alconost kernel: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. 
		    Self-destruct in 5 seconds.  Have a nice day...