From: Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...>
Date: 2008-01-09T01:32:45+09:00
Subject: Re: proc to block


On Jan 8, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
> Gary suggested using a symbol as a proc, which requires that Symbol
> implement the to_proc method, which is NOT part of standard Ruby prior
> to 1.9.

Rick, you just misread my original post a bit.  I didn't mention
Symbol#to_proc at all but I did hint at it by saying you 'just'
prefix the argument with '&'.  That sort of begs the question of
what happens if the argument isn't an instance of Proc but I didn't
want to muddy the waters at that point.  My example used a proc.

Gary Wright