From: Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Date: 2008-01-08T19:34:59+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] Bacon 0.9, a small RSpec clone

On 2008-01-07, Rob Sanheim <rsanheim@gmail.com> wrote:
> Neat...I checked out the code and it looks very nice and slim.
>
> My only concern is converting our many thousands of lines of specs
> written in test/spec if bacon is where all the goodness is going to be
> happening =).

test/spec has a bigger userbase already, and I try to keep bacon
rather small.  (Still, it has everything you need, really.)

IMO, a stable spec API is more useful than a featureful, but always
moving one.

I'll make test/spec bacon compatible in the long term, not the other
way round.  (That is, bacon-the-API will be really stable, so you can
run your specs with test/spec, bacon or taptap (to be released).)

> - Rob
-- 
Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen@gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org