From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
Date: 2007-12-27T18:28:34+09:00
Subject: Re: Purpose of Ruby 1.9?

botp wrote:
> On Dec 27, 2007 7:11 AM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 26, 2007, at 4:53 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
>>> I'm a little concerned that some folks are jumping on 1.9 as an
>>> immediate replacement for Ruby 1.8, which it isn't.
>> Me too:
>> http://pragdave.blogs.pragprog.com/pragdave/2007/12/ruby-19right-fo.html
> 
> will it be "safe" to say that the baptism of fire for ruby1.9 is
> lettting it run/support rails 2.0.2 without errors?
> 
> kind regards -botp
> 
> 
Well ... *after* it works on RSpec, rcov, flog, heckle, ZenTest, and all
of Ryan Davis' wonderful tools, sure, go ahead and fix Rails. :)