From: Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Date: 2007-12-23T07:44:59+09:00
Subject: Re: RubyGems 1.0.1

On 22 dic, 19:03, Karl von Laudermann <doodpa...@mailinator.com>
wrote:
> On Dec 21, 3:14 pm, Eric Hodel <drbr...@segment7.net> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 21, 2007, at 06:39 AM, Karl von Laudermann wrote:
>
> > > But in Cygwin,
> > > RubyGems will update itself if I just do "gem update", without
> > > specifying the --system flag. Has anyone else seen this?
>
> > Can you post a screenshot of this behavior?
>
> Well, it's kinda too late now since I already upgraded. But there's
> really not much to show; Under DOS, I did "gem update", and it just
> updated one gem. Then I did "gem update --system", and it updated
> RubyGems to 1.0.1, printing out a whole ton of stuff. Then in Cygwin,
> I did "gem update" and it printed out all the exact same stuff as "gem
> update --system" did under DOS, after which "gem -v" indicated that it
> was now version 1.0.1.

The ruby interperter you ran on cygwin was a cygwin ruby? (ruby -v
should indicate cygwin as platform).

I'm asking this since some users have ruby in they path mixing
native(vc6 or mingw) ruby with cygwin environment end in broken
things.