From: SunRaySon <sunrayson@...>
Date: 2007-12-19T01:28:57+09:00
Subject: Re: Best compiled language for extending Ruby

------=_Part_12672_25229970.1197995336647
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I had developed some applications using smalltalk but they are small utility
programs. I would prefer smalltalk for utility programs but I am not sure if
this is a good choice for getting good performance.

Kiran

On Dec 18, 2007 8:49 PM, jwmerrill@gmail.com <jwmerrill@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Dec 17, 11:32 pm, Sharkie Landshark <shark.fin.s...@mac.com> wrote:
> > I want to write my core logics in a compiled language for 1) performance
> > and 2) protecting my source code -- in case I will be selling my product
> > to a customer.
> >
> > What would be the most natural-supported-easy-fast language to do this
> > in, given the many choices of language bridges?
> >
> > I am particularly interested in,
> >
> > 1) C
> > 2) Objective C
> > 3) Ocaml
> > 4) Lisp (SBCL)
> > 5) Scheme
> >
> > Does anyone have experience and would like to share?
> >
> > I will be coding in OS X and deploying in FreeBSD mostly.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Shark
> > --
> > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
> There's rocaml: http://eigenclass.org/hiki/rocaml .  Never used it,
> but thought I'd mention it.
>
> JM
>
>

------=_Part_12672_25229970.1197995336647--