From: Konrad Meyer <konrad@...>
Date: 2007-12-18T15:08:35+09:00
Subject: Re: Best compiled language for extending Ruby

--nextPart239594412.YWJpI33WFh
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Quoth M. Edward (Ed) Borasky:
> Sharkie Landshark wrote:
> > I want to write my core logics in a compiled language for 1) performance
> > and 2) protecting my source code -- in case I will be selling my product
> > to a customer.
> >=20
> > What would be the most natural-supported-easy-fast language to do this
> > in, given the many choices of language bridges?
> >=20
> > I am particularly interested in,
> >=20
> > 3) Ocaml

=46or OCaml there is rocaml. http://eigenclass.org/repos/rocaml/head/

Regards,
=2D-=20
Konrad Meyer <konrad@tylerc.org> http://konrad.sobertillnoon.com/

--nextPart239594412.YWJpI33WFh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBHZ2PbCHB0oCiR2cwRAh+JAJ9wHJ2MQcK5a9NwzUlxshtrTJsSRgCeO1oe
kfnW9QRYPV6fu95B6kOAZqg=
=vM62
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart239594412.YWJpI33WFh--