From: Bob Gustafson <bobgus@...>
Date: 2001-12-13T02:55:56+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:28355] Re: Rendering UML diagrams?

>"Curt Hibbs" <curt@hibbs.com> wrote in message
>news:INEGJNJOFAMNDPNEABNEAEGHCHAA.curt@hibbs.com...
>> > From: dave@thomases.com [mailto:dave@thomases.com]On Behalf Of Dave
>> > Thomas
>> > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 7:11 PM
>> >
>> > If it helps, rubydoc (actually I don't know what to call it because
>> > RubyDoc is taken :) has pluggable output formatterswhich are passed a
>> > kind of AST tree for classes, modules, methods, and so on, so you
>> > should be able to plug that kind of UML generation directly in. Sounds
>> > like a job for dot... ?
>>
>> How about RDoc? or is that too crytic?
>
>RubberDuck?
>
>;-)
>
>MikkelFJ

RubberDuck - cool.

That has my vote :-)