From: Phrogz <phrogz@...>
Date: 2007-12-06T07:35:03+09:00
Subject: Re: hash

On Dec 5, 3:19 pm, MonkeeSage <MonkeeS...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 5, 4:02 pm, Phrogz <phr...@mac.com> wrote:
> > Yes, both of the pieces of code I wrote for you originally handle this
> > case just fine. Please read through the code and understand it. You
> > asked for pseudo-code originally, and I actually gave you fully-
> > functioning code. Now you just need to understand how to use it and
> > its output.
>
> Sorry about that Phrogz. I didn't read the other thread, I just
> glanced at it briefly the other day. I didn't realize you had already
> answered this fully.

Absolutely no need for an apology. Helping people isn't a competition
of who can answer first. And, if I choose to stop helping someone
because I've done as much as I'm willing to do, there's certainly no
etiquette that says you shouldn't step in.

I'm glad you helped Johnathan get further towards his solution that I
did, and certainly I don't care that you used your own code versus
mine.

But I appreciate the sentiment. :)