From: malugu satyajit <malugu.satyajit@...>
Date: 2007-12-03T07:58:40+09:00
Subject: Re: gem require 'activerecord' or 'active_record'

------=_Part_4459_9153333.1196636322909
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Is it ok, to post Rails questions in this ruby list?

I have one question.

Can we have modules and mixins in rails framework? If so, what is the ideal
place to put it in the MVC framework.

Specifically I have one SuperClass and three sub classes, except some all
the functionality of the sub classes can be inherited from the super class.

I can give you much more details.

Satyajit

On Dec 2, 2007 3:35 PM, Kyle Schmitt <kyleaschmitt@gmail.com> wrote:

> It may have something to do with the version of ruby installed, or how
> activerecord was installed, or ruby was setup, etc etc.
> I recall that older versions of ruby need you to require 'rubygems' to
> access libraries installed with gem, where newer versions do not.  It
> could be some similar sort of switch in behavior....
>
> --Kyle
>
> On Dec 2, 2007 11:00 AM, jansenh <henning.jansen@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi comp.lang.ruby
> >
> > I am doing my first thing with ActiveRecord (without Rails), and to
> > help me out I have the 'Pro ActiveRecord' book from APress, which is a
> > fine resource, except from one annoying thing; all pieces of sample
> > code in the book uses the statement:
> >
> >   require 'activerecord'
> >
> > which refuses to work on both my windows-ruby and ubuntu-ruby setups.
> > Searching this group I learned that using the statement:
> >
> >   require 'active_record'
> >
> > solves that problem. What am I missing? What's the difference between
> > the two, and why is only one of them working on my code?
> >
> >
> > regards, henning
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
Regards,
M.Satyajit
Graduate Student,
Department of Computer Science,
NCSU.
www4.ncsu.edu/~smalugu

------=_Part_4459_9153333.1196636322909--