From: Yukihiro Matsumoto Date: 2007-11-28T13:37:05+09:00 Subject: Re: Binary Logic, Bug or Feature? Hi, In message "Re: Binary Logic, Bug or Feature?" on Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:33:36 +0900, "Malcolm Lockyer" writes: |I have been pulling my hair out for the last 20 minutes trying to find |out what is wrong in my app that has some pretty basic binary logic. |Here is a concise example in an irb session that shows my problem |(certainly, what I was working on wasn't nearly as simple the sides of |AND were variables etc.): | |?> x = true and true |=> true |>> x |=> true | |(this is what I expect, true and true = true) | |>> x = true and false |=> false |>> x |=> true | |But what I've got here is "true and false" == false, but it assigns |true to x. So true and false == false, but really == true... Have I |lost my mind, should it do this? Does it do it for anyone else? It |seems weird to me since the first example does what I expect, but the |second doesn't... Precedence. x = true and false is parsed as (x = true) and false not x = (true and false) matz.