From: Trollen Lord <trollenlord@...>
Date: 2007-11-28T06:59:57+09:00
Subject: Re: "Why I Program In Ruby (And Maybe Why You Shouldn't)"

------=_Part_352_26135264.1196200798911
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

> XULPlanet.com has in-depth documentation however. [2]. I have no
> problem with JS, but some people hate it.


I'd say the ui of my Firefox is a little bit sluggish if compared to some
others... It is clearly visible on slower computers. Other than that it is a
good example of more modern approach and I kind of like the idea. However,
Ruby way would not likely use XML but Ruby classes? People (at least I learn
that with Rails and all the definitions:) are used to defining things like
that.

I don't question the market share! And obviously, monkey-makers like


Yeah it's better since I just wrote a study about the market share of
GNU/Linux and while at it saw all the numbers about the other platforms as
well and can drown anyone in a plethora of references if required ;-)


> Server, aren;t guaranteed to work. My point was simply this; you can't
> use a relatively new platform to hold against toolkits that took years
> to integrate with the old platform. The standard is still the old
> platform, the new, is, well...new!
>

Still more important from many viewpoints though than some other older
platforms ever.

------=_Part_352_26135264.1196200798911--